Which of these strategies is NOT advisable when restoring infrastructure?

When restoring infrastructure following a disaster, it is crucial to learn from past experiences to improve future recovery efforts. Ignoring the lessons learned from previous disasters can lead to repeating mistakes that could exacerbate vulnerabilities or lead to inefficient recovery processes. Past disasters often provide valuable insights into what worked well and what did not, allowing communities to make informed decisions that enhance resilience and preparedness.

Conversely, engaging the community in decision-making, aligning with established disaster recovery frameworks, and assessing environmental changes post-disaster are all effective strategies. Involving the community ensures that the restoration efforts address the specific needs and priorities of those affected. Aligning with disaster recovery frameworks helps to ensure that recovery efforts are structured, systematic, and leverage best practices. Assessing environmental changes post-disaster is essential to understand the impact of the disaster and to inform future planning and infrastructure development, ensuring a more sustainable and resilient approach.